Theology November: A Review of a Book about New Thought

Happy Lies by Melissa Dougherty, Zondervan, 2025

This review was originally posted, in a slightly different form, on Goodreads in June 2025.

This book is a capable history of New Thought in the Christian church, particularly in America. The author first sketches how she grew up around a lot of New Thought and mistook it for Christianity. Then, she sketches how after she realized many of these beliefs were wrong, for some years she was calling them New Age because that’s what everyone else called them. She discusses how she learned of the term New Thought and how it differs from the New Age.

Both belief systems partake of Gnostic/Hermetic cosmology and theory of human nature. However, New Age embraces neopaganism and the occult, whereas New Thought instead tries to cast these Hermetic ideas in “Christianese” and read them back into the New Testament. This is made easier because many New Testament writers were talking directly back to Gnostics, and even re-purposing their terms.

Melissa unpacks the Gnostic/Hermetic assumptions behind such common “Christian” practices as the Prosperity Gospel, visualization, affirmations, “I am” statements, and the like. But instead of just dismissing these practices as “ppf, that’s pagan,” she actually shows where they originated and how they differ from orthodox Christianity.

This book does not dive deeply into the pagan side of Gnosticism and Hermeticism. It doesn’t discuss these philosophies’ relationship to Western mysticism, Eastern mysticism, Kabbalism, or German philosophers like Hegel. It doesn’t discuss the attempts in the early centuries after Christianity to integrate Gnosticism with Christianity. The history of these philosophies is a huge topic that could take up a lifetime of study.

Melissa’s book is not meant to be an intimidating doorstop of a book that covers all of this. She’s zooming in on one little twig on this big, ugly tree: New Thought and its influence on American Christianity. Her book gives well-meaning Christians the tools and vocabulary to recognize this kind of thought and to talk about it. I have bought copies to give to all the women in my family. New Thought can be difficult to talk about because it portrays itself as “what Jesus actually taught.” If you know someone who is into New Thought, you cannot just dismiss it as “No, that’s Gnostic.” Even though you are right, to them it will sound like you’re just brushing them off. This book might be useful in such a situation.

If you want to find out how Hermeticism gave birth to Marxism through Hegel and Marx, there is a fantastic series of lectures about it on YouTube by James Lindsay. I also recommend Melissa’s YouTube channel and the YouTube channel Cultish.

13 thoughts on “Theology November: A Review of a Book about New Thought

    1. Jennifer Mugrage's avatar Jennifer Mugrage

      I’m not on Twitter, which seems to be where he gets spiciest, but I certainly benefitted greatly from his long-form walks through Marx, Hegel, Rousseau, the Postmodernists, the Critical Race Theorists, Paolo Friere, and Hermeticism a few years ago.

      Like

    1. Jennifer Mugrage's avatar Jennifer Mugrage

      You are exactly right.

      In Gnosticism, matter is actually evil, and the creation of the physical universe was a mistake.

      In Hermeticism, matter is ontologically inferior, and the experience of being embodied is a roundabout way to eventually be united to the pantheistic god once again.

      Unfortunately, there are many expressions in the New Testament that can be read as supporting these ideas if one has a mind to do so. It’s a lot harder to get “our bodies don’t matter” out of the Old Testament.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Eustacia | Eustea Reads Cancel reply